Arctura isn’t a menu of verticals — it’s a set of composable capabilities. Rating, attestation and ingest are asset-agnostic bits, built once and applied to any physical asset. That’s what makes it a platform, not a product.
The interface changes. The decision record does not.
illustrative architecture · 90/10 modular
The Total Asset Score — four risk pillars into one A–F grade, with a knockout veto. A pure function of config and telemetry.
Every asset's grade rolls up to a distribution, concentration view and month-over-month movement across the whole book.
Issue any grade as a hash-verifiable credential — did:web + W3C VC 2.0, written to an append-only SHA-256 hash chain.
Can your data support the decision, or reconstruct an incident? A readiness score for the data behind the rating — not a claim about the asset.
Config-driven onboarding. Map any sensor feed to the canonical model via an adapter — no bespoke pipeline per asset class.
A catalogue of rating attestations (DHC / BEHC). Arctura issues its own rating output; the OEM or owner issues the regulatory passport.
A core engine (90%) and thin vertical config (10%) talk only through adapters — so a new asset class is a config file, not a rewrite. Duty-robustness is proven across classes (heavy-transport ↔ grid-storage zero-shot under 3%). We don’t claim cross-vertical data synergy — we don’t need to.
Rate every megawatt-hour across the BESS lifecycle — financing to underwriting to incident review.
Rate the truck, not just the telematics — chemistry- and duty-aware SoH forecasting.
Self-serve operations for smaller fleets. A different motion, a different buyer.
Score one asset over the API, or embed the whole rating standard as a white-label surface.